• Users Online: 155
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 21-24

Comparative evaluation of buckling resistance of Proglider and One-G file: An in vitro study


Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.G.V's K.B.H. Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Swapnil Janardan Kolhe
Audumbar, Mangalmurti Nagar, Next to RTO Colony, Nashik-Pune Road, Nashik - 422 011, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/endo.endo_121_17

Rights and Permissions

Aim: Comparative evaluation of buckling resistance of Proglider and One-G file, An In vitro Study. Materials and Methods: The test instruments – Proglider and One-G files were subjected to a devised buckling resistance test, which consisted of the application of an increasing load in the axial direction of the instrument by using a universal testing machine. The maximum load required to generate a lateral elastic displacement of 1 mm was recorded for each instrument. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test. Results: The results indicated that the buckling resistance of One-G files is significantly better than Proglider files (P < 0.05). Conclusion: One-G rotary files manufactured with conventional nickel-titanium alloy showed higher buckling resistance compared to Proglider files manufactured with M-wire alloy.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed154    
    Printed21    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded71    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal