• Users Online: 691
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 38-44

Quantitative assessment of surface roughness with chlorine dioxide irrigant on root canal dentin by three-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy


Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dayanand Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rejitha R Kamalasanan
TC: 28/1572, Kamal Building, Thakarapparambu, Pazhvangadi, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 023, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/endo.endo_62_17

Rights and Permissions

Aim: (1) To evaluate the active chlorine concentrations of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 5% chlorine dioxide (ClO2) and 13.8% ClO2using iodometric titration. (2) To evaluate the effects of different concentrations of ClO2 (5% and 13.8%) with or without 17% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), on the surface roughness of radicular dentin using three-dimensional-confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted human permanent single rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated, longitudinal split into halves and randomly divided into five groups based on the different irrigation regime: Group 1: 3% NaOCl + 17% EDTA, Group 2: 5% ClO2 +17% EDTA, Group 3: 5% ClO2,Group 4: 13.8% ClO2,and Group 5: Saline. The specimens were observed under CLSM to measure the surface roughness. Iodometric titration of the test irrigants were done to evaluate the concentration of active chlorine. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test. Results: Mean surface roughness values to root canal dentin were as follows: 13.8% ClO2 >3% NaOCl + 17% EDTA >5% ClO2 + 17% EDTA >5% ClO2> Saline. The active chlorine concentration was highest for 13.8% ClO2and chlorine loss % was highest for 5% ClO2. Conclusion: According to the present study, 5% ClO2produced root canal dentin roughness with minimal erosiveness, which is advantageous. Hence, it can be considered to be an alternate endodontic irrigant. Nearly 13.8% ClO2should be reevaluated as an irrigating solution, because of its significiant dentin roughness and thus it can promote microleakage.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed854    
    Printed59    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded135    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal