• Users Online: 182
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 20-25

Comparative evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using three different file systems: An in vitro study


Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, AMC Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Correspondence Address:
Urvashi M Ujariya
AMC Dental College and Hospital, Bhalakia Mill Compound, Khokhra, Maninagar, Ahmedabad - 380 008, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/endo.endo_42_19

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: One of the most important factors which form the foundation of successful root canal treatment is cleaning and shaping without extruding significant amount of debris in periradicular tissues. Aims: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the amount of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation with three different instrumentation systems. Materials and Methods: The mesiobuccal canals of ninety mature, human mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 30 teeth/group). Each group was instrumented using one of the three different instrumentation systems: WaveOne Gold (WOG), self-adjusting files (SAFs), and Hyflex EDM (HEDM). The canals were irrigated using bidistilled water. Debris extruded was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes, and the extruded irrigant was evaporated. The weight of the dry extruded debris was established by comparing the pre- and post-instrumentation weight of Eppendorf tubes for each group. Statistical Analysis: The debris extrusion was compared and statistically analyzed using the analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test. Results: The WOG and HEDM file systems produced significantly more debris compared with SAF system (P < 0.05). Conclusions: All instrumentation systems tested produced apical extrusion of debris. SAFs extruded significantly lesser amount of debris than WOG and HEDM.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed917    
    Printed56    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded213    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal