• Users Online: 232
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 43-48

A population-based observational morphologic measurements of anatomic landmarks in maxillary and mandibular molar


1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College and Hospital, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Subharti Dental College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission16-Sep-2020
Date of Decision12-Jan-2021
Date of Acceptance12-Feb-2021
Date of Web Publication23-Mar-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Esha Agarwal
Subharti Dental College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/endo.endo_132_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Aim: The aim of this study is to study the morphological measurements of external and internal anatomic landmarks in human maxillary and mandibular molars and their correlation with critical pulp chamber morphology.
Materials and Methods: A total of 200 mandibular and maxillary molar teeth of patients were evaluated. Teeth whose pulp chamber were not violated by caries, restoration, fracture crown, and those having closed apex were included in the study. Teeth were subjected to radiovisiography of bitewing projection and imaging tool was utilized for measuring-A: Distance from the pulp chamber floor to the furcation, B: Distance from the pulp chamber ceiling to the furcation, C: Distance from the buccal cusp tip to the furcation, D: Distance from the buccal cusp to the floor of the pulp chamber, E: Distance from the buccal cusp to the ceiling of pulp chamber, and F: Pulp chamber height. Differences in the measurements were examined using the Student's t-test and Pearson correlations. All results were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.
Results: There were significant differences found among the various measurements between young and old population groups (P < 0.05). The highest percentage variance was found for the height of the pulp chamber (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The knowledge of pulp chamber morphology should be integrated with preoperative radiograph and intraoperative tactile perception during endodontic access preparation.

Keywords: Access cavity, anatomic landmarks, bitewing, molar, pulp chamber


How to cite this article:
Agarwal E, Nikhil V. A population-based observational morphologic measurements of anatomic landmarks in maxillary and mandibular molar. Endodontology 2021;33:43-8

How to cite this URL:
Agarwal E, Nikhil V. A population-based observational morphologic measurements of anatomic landmarks in maxillary and mandibular molar. Endodontology [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 10];33:43-8. Available from: https://www.endodontologyonweb.org/text.asp?2021/33/1/43/311744




  Introduction Top


Among the various steps of the root canal treatment, a good access is the first and arguably one of the most important phases as it reduces the chances of endodontic failure. However, it can be the most challenging and imperative for a quality endodontic treatment, prevention of iatrogenic problems such as furcal perforations which are often most frustrating aspect of endodontic treatment too.[1],[2]

Access preparations usually demand a qualitative approach through clinician's tactile perception and thorough knowledge of dental anatomy. Although the invent of high-speed hand piece holds the drawback of loss of control and tactile perception, the laws of access cavity preparation in our standard endodontic textbooks emphasizes on the drop or dip effect while entering the pulp chamber, but this might get adversely influenced by the calcific complications of the pulp chamber, insufficient clinical experience, or poor visibility.[3] Thus, a blind reliance on tactile perception alone, may yield undesirable results, causing perforation and/or the gauging of the pulp chamber. Perforation through the pulp chamber floor into the furcation of any tooth is a serious endodontic issue and may slow down the prognosis of the tooth, requiring extraction in some cases.[4]

Shaw and Jones studied the morphological variations of the pulp chamber from the radiographs and concluded that the pulp chambers dimensions in maxillary and mandibular molars decrease with age due to continuous secondary dentin formation throughout life and apposition of sclerotic and tertiary dentin on the internal walls.[5] In addition, the crown length also decreases due to the physiological and pathological tooth wear with age.[6]

Numerous studies have presented with anatomic variations of the root canals among different races of people.[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] However, morphological variations concerning pulp chambers across different races of people are not clearly known and the literature lacks evidence based on ethnic and racial grounds. There are a few radiographic studies conducted on the South Indian population to study the pulp chamber dimensions in molars and have laid stress on the importance of preoperative radiographic assessment to achieve an ideal and conservative access cavity preparation.[10],[11] However, in the North Indian population, there are no such studies conducted.

Therefore, this study aimed to measure the key internal and external anatomical landmarks relating to pulp chamber morphology in maxillary and mandibular molars and validate the precision of such measurements. The hypothesis of the present study was that external and internal anatomic landmarks are not random and that the measurements will be similar in all molar teeth.


  Materials and Methods Top


This present observational study was conducted in the department of conservative dentistry and endodontics. This study was based on the Western U. P population. Subject after getting approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee vide letter Reference No. SDC/E. C/2018/dated on 20.03.2018, written informed consent was obtained from all the participants to access their digital radiographs – the consent form requesting details of their age, sex, and the ethnicity of their parents and their grandparents. A total sample size of 200 patients was selected as per previous study conducted by Deutsch and Musikant.[12]

Noncarious, mature molars without a history of root canal treatment or restoration, patients in the age group between 21 and 60 years, and natives of Western U. P. were included in this study. They were placed into two groups based on chronological age as Group 1: 21–40 years and Group 2: 40–60 years. There were 100 patients each in Group A and B. 100 patients of each group comprised of 50 males and 50 female patients, of which 50 maxillary and 50 mandibular radiographs were studied. Equal number of patients, comprising of 50 males and 50 females were taken from the outpatient department so as to study if sexual dimorphism could result in anatomic variation in landmarks. Further maxillary and mandibular molars both were taken in the study.

Maxillary and mandibular molars of patients of different age groups (young and old) were subjected to radiovisiography (RVG), using the model Kodak Carestream RVG 5200 digital radiography system. RVG of bitewing projection, supporting the sensor in a Rinn XCP bitewing holder and beam alignment device (paralleling device) designed by the company, Dentsply Sirona. The XCP device has a collimator ring that is parallel with the film-holding plane of the X-ray film holder. This positioning helps to align the plane of the unseen, intraorally located X-ray film parallel with the plane of the cross section of the X-ray beam.

All the radiographs were shot by an experience radiographer in bitewing projection and were exposed for 0.18 s at 70 kVp and 8 mA.

The digital recorded images were studied, and image calibration of different morphological anatomical landmarks was made by the measuring tool in the software, KODAK RVG 5100 Digital dental imaging software [Carestream Health Inc, Atlanta, U.S]. Six anatomical landmarks measurements were made by two operators separately (who were blinded about patient information) with the help of the imaging tool to eliminate the observer bias and in case of disagreement consensus were made after discussion and recorded [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. For each landmark, reading was made thrice, and the mean was taken as final data. In [Figure 1], anatomic landmarks are denoted by various color codings:
Figure 1: Bitewing radiograph of maxillary and mandibular molars showing measurements of various landmarks in the young population. A: Yellow, B: Blue, C: Black, D: Red, E: Green and F: Purple

Click here to view
Figure 2: Bitewing radiograph of maxillary and mandibular molars showing measurements of various landmarks in the old population.

Click here to view


A: Yellow, B: Blue, C: Black, D: Red, E: Green, and F: Purple

Measurement-A: Distance from the pulp chamber floor to the furcation. Measurement-B: Distance from the pulp chamber ceiling to the furcation. Measurement-C: Distance from the buccal cusp tip to the furcation. Measurement-D: Distance from the buccal cusp to the floor of the pulp chamber. Measurement-E: Distance from the buccal cusp to the ceiling of pulp chamber. Measurement-F: Pulp chamber height. In statistical analysis, all the calibrations were recorded, and the mean morphological measurements were made.

Detailed percentage variance was calculated for all the measurements. Differences in the measurements were examined using the Student's t-test and Pearson correlations.[13] All results were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (20.0) software package (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to study the various analysis.


  Results Top


The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation for each measurement are presented in [Table 1]. Statistically significant differences were found in the mean sizes of pulp chamber between the young and old population (P < 0.001). The mean measurements of different anatomic landmarks were collectively calculated for maxillary and mandibular molars, and comparison was made between the two groups. Significant differences were noted for certain measurements [Table 2].
Table 1: Comparative evaluation of measurements of different anatomic landmarks in mm by their mean, standard deviation, percentage variance, and P value between young and old population

Click here to view
Table 2: Mean measurements of different anatomic landmarks of maxillary and mandibular molars recorded collec

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Based on the evidence in the literature regarding significant craniofacial differences among North Indian verses South Indian population, it can be presumed that the same morphological and anatomic differences might exist in dental tissues as well.

Hence, this in vivo study was conducted in North Western Uttar Pradesh population with an aim to measure external anatomical landmarks and their correlation with critical morphology of pulp chamber in mandibular and maxillary molars using intraoral bitewing radiographs and to check for anatomic differences, if existed any. As the pulp space morphology is dynamic in nature and changes with age and the dimensions of tooth also changes with age thus two different age groups patients were evaluated in this study to find out influence of age on different landmarks. None of the studies in the literature have been conducted on both maxillary and mandibular molars simultaneously, neither have included all the parameters, like one done in the present study.

A paralleling device with standardized voltage, current and time was used to shoot each bitewing radiograph. Along with this magnification tool and invert image tools were also utilized to understand the digital image better before marking and making measurements of various landmarks for minimizing the errors.

On comparison of mean values of younger group in the present study with older group, significant differences can be noted in the mean values of the distance from the pulp chamber floor to furcation and in the height of the pulp chamber which has directly influenced the mean distances of all other landmarks in the older population. Layering of secondary dentin more toward the roof and pulp chamber floor as compared to other sites as the age advances is the reason of increase dimension of landmark A. Landmarks B, C, D, E, and F remain affected due to the same aforementioned reason.

The mean dentin thickness between the pulp chamber floor and furcation (A) for maxillary molars was observed to be 2.88 mm. Deutsch and Musikant[12] when observed the same landmark in their population found it to be 3.05 mm and Khojastepour et al.[14] found it to be 3.18 mm. Another study by Velmurugan et al.[10] found it to be 2.7 mm which was in accordance with the result of the present study.

The difference observed between the Indian and foreign studies result may be due to the difference in ethnic diversities. This observation again reinforces the thought that the values for different parameters should be checked from population to population rather than following blindly on any of the conducted studies in the world.

The mean dentin thickness from the pulp chamber floor till the furcation (A) for mandibular molars was observed to be 2.99 mm. The mean measurement from the buccal cusp tip till the furcation in maxillary molars was observed to be 11.27 mm which is in accordance to the study conducted by Velmurugan et al.[10] When the same landmark, i.e., C was observed in mandibular teeth, the mean value came to be 10.75 mm which is again agrees with the study conducted by Deutsch et al.[15] and Khojastepour et al.[14]

The mean measurement from the buccal cusp tip to the pulp chamber floor (D) was observed to be 8.10 mm for the maxillary molars. On observation of Landmark D in mandibular molars, the mean value came to be 7.59 mm, which is quite near to the same landmark observation done by Deutsch et al. The height of tooth structure from the buccal cusp tip to the pulp chamber ceiling came out as a mean value of 6.0 mm which was slightly lower than the studies done by Khojasteour et al. and Velmurugan et al. [Table 2]. The pulp chamber size in mandibular molars was smaller than the pulp chamber size of maxillary molars which is in accordance with a study by Deutsch, Khojasteour, and Lokade et al.[16]

As the pulp chamber size as well as the dentin thickness from the pulp chamber floor to the furcation was seen to be more in maxillary molars than their counter mandibular molar. Thus, the landmark B was also found to be more than mandibular molars in the present study. When the thickness of dentin in the furcation area was compared among mandibular and maxillary molars, it was more pronounced in mandibular molars.

However, statistically significant difference was not found. The slight increase of this value in mandibular molars can be explained by higher masticatory load beard by mandibular molars when compared with maxillary molars. Numerous studies suggest that secondary dentin apposition occurs primarily on the floor of the pulp chamber instead of the ceiling.[5],[17],[18]

Tidmarsh stated that “the growth of dentin upon the pulp chamber floors, apparently without cause, is of some significance to the endodontist who desires to gain entrance to the root canals.”[18] However, the result of this comparison is contradictory to what it is observed by Deutsch and Musikant. The mean value of the distance from the buccal cusp tip to the furcation (C) in maxillary molar was found to be 11.256 mm which was slightly more than the mandibular molars (10.75 mm) for the same landmark.

Similarly, the distance from the buccal cusp tip to the pulp chamber floor observed in mandibular molars was found to be significantly less than maxillary molars that is, 8.102 mm which can be attributed to the fact that mandibular molars have smaller pulp chamber size, have greater deposition of secondary dentin at the floor of pulp chamber and more wear.[19] Percentage variance was recorded largest for the landmark F which represents the pulp chamber height.

This inter-tooth variation in the height of the pulp chamber is probably the result of secondary dentin apposition. This is in accordance to the study conducted by Azim et al.[20] The thickness of the pulp chamber decreases with age indicating the deposition of dentin.[13],[19] The dimensions of pulp chamber should be related with the age.

This is important during access cavity preparation as the drop effect cannot be appreciated. With the use of ultrasonics and magnification, we do not need to necessarily rely on the drop effect but a very few clinicians are operating under magnification. A study conducted on comparative evaluation of endodontic practice trends in India revealed that only 4.6% of the respondents used magnification >75% of the time.[21] The results of another study assessing the awareness and attitude of dental surgeons toward magnification showed that 78.1% did not use any magnification during dental procedure,[22] thus necessitating the knowledge of anatomic variations in external landmarks while making an access. The second largest variation was observed for landmark A, which is again influenced by the apposition of secondary dentin. An interesting finding to be noted in the present study is that the measurements from the cusp tip to furcation and various points in the pulp chamber were the least variable of all the measurements that is landmark C, D, and E. The results of this study agree with the results of Deutsch and Musikant.

Affixing a stop or a mark on a bur 6–6.5 mm from the cutting tip will enable the dentist to drill into the middle of the pulp chamber without fear of iatrogenic perforation. In cases, where operator yet fails to negotiate the canals, it is advocated to take a radiograph to look for calcific complications in the pulp chamber.

All the measurements were made digitally using the magnification and invert image tool and measuring each landmark thrice to get final reading by two operators to minimize errors and bias. In the present study, there was focus only on tooth without restoration or decay violating the pulp chamber to allow adequate identification of the studied parameter.

The limitation of this study was that the bitewing radiographs provided only two dimensional information. A cone-beam computed tomography would have given information in all three dimensions.

It is noteworthy that teeth with restoration or decay encroaching on to the pulp chamber are the most problematic during access preparation. However, the low CV of measurements of D and E and the consistency of results with other reports indicate that these readings can be used as guidelines for accessing those altered teeth as well.


  Conclusion Top


Prior to access cavity preparation pre-evaluation of bitewing and IOPA radiographs is a must requirement in absence of CBCT for successful endodontic access. In addition to age, wear, injury and secondary dentin formation, ethnic variation do influence the internal and external landmarks. Thus population with ethical community should be evaluated individually for making the guidelines.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Rhodes J, Patel S. A practical guide to endodontic access cavity preparation in molar teeth. Br Dent J 2007;203:133-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, Berman LH. Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ashwini BS, Prasanna K, Laksmi K. Access is success. Guident 2016;20:39-42.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kaushik A, Talwar S, Yadav S, Chaudhary S, Nawal RR. Management of iatrogenic root perforation with pulp canal obliteration. Saudi Endod J 2014;4:141-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
  [Full text]  
5.
Shaw L, Jones AD. Morphological considerations of the dental pulp chamber from radiographs of molar and premolar teeth. J Dent 1984;12:139-45.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Farzin M, Giti R, Heidari E. Age-related changes in tooth dimensions in adults in Shiraz, Iran. J Int Oral Health 2020;12 Suppl S1:24-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bansal D, Mahajan M. Morphological variations in the root canal system of mandibular premolars in the population of Uttarakhand. IJADS 2016;2:68-71.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Peiris R, Malwatte U, Abayakoon J, WettasingheA. Variations in the root form and root anal morphology of permanent mandibular first molars in a Sri Lankan population. Anat Res Int 2015;2015:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kottoor J, Albuquerque D, Velmurugan N, Kuruvilla J. Root anatomy and root canal configuration of human permanent mandibular premolars: A Systematic Review. Anat Res Int 2013;2013:1-14  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Velmurugan N, Venkateshbabu N, Abarajithan M, Kandaswamy D. Evaluation of the pulp chamber size of human maxillary first molars: An institution based in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19:92-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Srinath S, Somasundaram J. Dimensions of pulp chamber and furcal dentin in mandibular first molar in south Indian population – A radiographic study. J Pharm Sci Res 2017;9:1106-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Morphological measurements of anatomic landmarks in human maxillary and mandibular molar pulp chambers. J Endod 2004;30:388-90.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chandler NP, Pitt Ford TR, Monteith BD. Coronal pulp size in molars: A study of bitewing radiographs. Int Endod J 2003;36:757-63.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Khojastepour L, Rahimizadeh N, Khayat A. Morphologic measurements of anatomic landmarks in pulp chambers of human first molars: A study of bitewing radiographs. Iran Endod J 2008;2:147-51.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Gu S, Isidro M. Morphological measurements of anatomic landmarks in pulp chambers of human maxillary furcated bicuspids. J Endod 2005;31:570-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lokade J, Rawlani S, Baheti R, Roy S, Chandak M, Lohe V. Morphological measurements of anatomic landmarks in human mandibular molar pulp chambers – An in vivo study. J Kor Dent Sci 2011;4:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Philippas CG. Influence of occlusal wear and age on formation of dentin. J Dent Res 1961;40:1186.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tidmarsh BG. Micromorphology of pulp chambers in human molar teeth. Int Endod J 1980;13:69-75.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Bodrumlu E, Cicek E, Dundar C. Age and sex-related differences of pulp chamber size in mandibular second molars. Indian J Dent Res 2013;24:742-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
20.
Azim AA, Azim KA, Deutsch AS, Huang GT. Acquisition of anatomic parameters concerning molar pulp chamber landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2014;40:1298-302.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kohli A, Singh S, Podar R, Dadu S, Kulkarni G. A comparative evaluation of endodontic practice trends in India: “The Mumbai study”. Indian J Dent Res 2014;25:729-36.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
22.
Alhazzazi TY, Alzebiani NA, Alotaibi SK, Bogari DF, Bakalka GT, Hazzazi LW, et al. Awareness and attitude toward using dental magnification among dental students and residents at King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:21.  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed90    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded28    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]